When we think of colors, Sketch still doesn’t support the use of colors as variables that affect many aspects of the file. M/card/ danger (where danger is the boson and refers to the red color in the alert box).A/btn/ small (where small is the boson and refers to the static dimensions of the button, in pixels).H2/ center (where “center” is the boson and refers to the alignment of the text).link/ secondary (where “secondary” is the boson and refers to the color and underline applied to the text style for links in the website’s footer).
#Atomic heart development hell code#
Don’t forget to be faithful to the same classifications used on the code level. Having reached a behavior specification (if the symbol is fluid, if the text is aligned to the center and in bold, etc.), save that in styles which reflect these specifications. In general, bosons reflect modifications on other elements, for example:įor this reason, the presence of bosons in the graphic file is especially on the adjustment panels. Listen, with an open heart, to the problems a developer faces when he gets a poorly done layout and to the suggestions on how this process could improve. Understand in practice what are the quarks, bosons, atoms, molecules, templates, pages, and whatever other structure you could create to solve a real problem. Talk to your developer friend and ask him or her to tell you how he or she works or how he or she could work (in case he doesn’t already) in an ideal scenario (and atomic). I’ve been preaching this concept for some time, but the truth is that applying it is much harder than I thought it would be when it came to my mind… The term “mirrored” comes exactly from the principle of following the same rules of structure, classification, variables, etc. If the UI and the code follow the same componentization structure, this will reduce frictions between designers and developers. If an icon is a quark, by altering it, you alter even the most complex elements, such as molecules or pages.Īs a reference, I currently more or less use Suissa’s proposal, made up by Bosons and Quarks, besides Atoms, Molecules, Organisms, Templates, and Pages.įollowing the same atomic structure from the layout until the front-end. ControlĪn atomic structure naturally implies an increase on the scale of control. Once the component set is structured, the construction of new screens becomes incredibly quicker (around 80% faster, from my own personal experience). The logic that “fixed” components generate flexibility might sound conflicting, but I have one word for you: LEGO. Well-defined components don’t leave room for consistency problems, no matter how many screens your project has.
I’m not going to take long on this subject since this isn’t new, but I want to make it clear as to why I consider it a fundamental part of the design process: Consistency But is there still room for improvement? There always is :) It’s a concept: componentizing something, from the smallest element to the largest.Įven on different platforms (code editor vs image editor), it’s possible to improve the alignment between design and code by applying the same concept, and from there, a hierarchic tree and similar controls.Įvery designer loves to work with symbols, and developers were already componentizing things before you even opened Photoshop for the first time.
#Atomic heart development hell how to#
The foundations of atomic design were there even before Brad Frost and you should understand how to take advantage of this concept in your daily life.Ītomic design is not a technique or a methodology.
0 kommentar(er)
